Friday, February 29, 2008

Ramping Up an Assault on Our Good Sense


(Click on the Map)

The machine is beginning to crank it up. The defense of the House budget is just beginning.

In case you've missed it, the Virginia House of Delegates has proposed a biennial budget that plays games with education funding. The House plan, if adopted will manage to give most of the required new money for Standards of Quality (SOQ) re-benchmarking for the two year term, but it's the devil in the details that really hamstrings the future. Beginning in the years after this budget runs its course, the formula that currently is in compliance with the state constitution and code, will be altered so that future increases in education funding will be capped. Looking ahead, there will be dramatic implications for education funding as noted on the Google Map at the top. Roanoke County will be negatively impacted in 2010 losing $66 per student. Other localities will be hit even harder.

Be prepared for the assault from the House Lawyer Corps. They will no doubt tell us that the VEA is some kind of misguided, wacky special interest group that is misrepresenting the facts. You will most certainly hear House mouthpieces harrumph with exasperation over VEA's characterization that the House budget reduces education funds. They will note that they are increasing money for education, and that there's no way an increase can be a reduction. They won't stop there. They will loudly proclaim that they have a clear vision of how to employ fiscally responsible methods and principles to manage the education component in the budget without raising taxes.

Their claims will be presented as gospel with bully tones. Do not allow yourself to be misguided and bullied; the House budget is bad medicine for education in Virginia.


Budget conferees are discussing the budget possibilities in Richmond. You can affect a positive outcome for education by writing to them and letting them know where you stand. VEA has made this communication very easy, just take action!





Thursday, February 28, 2008

The Fall Line

Act Now! Jetzt handeln! Actúa ahora! Закон в настоящее время! Agire ora!


February 28, 2008

Dear RCEA Members,

For the past couple of weeks VEA has been monitoring some disturbing developments at the state general assembly regarding educational funding and teacher compensation. If you recall, VEA was initially disappointed with the Governor’s proposed budget. Although it included a full rebenchmarking of the Standards of Quality, it had very little support for teacher compensation.

Since that time the Senate and House have weighed in with their budgets for education, and after careful study, it’s apparent that the House budget, if approved, would be very damaging to education funding not only for the two year term of the budget, but on into the future. Penny Hodge, in her NEWS item to all Roanoke County employees today, explains the proposed House budget best.

The Governor’s, House, and Senate budgets all include approximately the same total dollars for Roanoke County Schools. There are, however, some significant differences in how those dollars are allocated to the school system. The House budget proposes to permanently change the funding formula so that future raises given to teachers are capped within the funding formula at the rate approved by the state. This effectively shifts the cost of future raises in excess of the typical 1% annualized state approved rate from the state to the local school divisions. The House has included funding for raises and additional construction grants in their 2008-09 budget so that it appears that the total revenue is as good as the Senate and Governor budgets. However, the funding for the raises and construction may or may not be included in future budgets and, in the meantime, the funding formula will have been permanently changed to reduce state aid to schools.

As many of you know, VEA has a team of legislative specialists led by Rob Jones and our very own Doris Boitnott. They have been keeping tabs on the situation and provide daily reports. The budget proposals are currently being debated by budget conferees. These legislators, a small band of senators and delegates, will hash out the details of the entire state budget and try to come to consensus. If the Senate conferees aren’t able to dissuade the House conferees from their destructive path for education funding, then the last line of defense would be the Governor’s veto pen. We simply don’t know for sure where the Governor will side in that battle, if it comes to that.

So our best option now is to contact the budget conferees directly and immediately!

The VEA has made this very easy.

Visit this link

http://www.veanea.org/legislative_contact.asp

and click on

Tell Budget Conferees to Support Public Education in Budget.

Rob and Doris have set the system up to send a letter on your behalf to each conferee. You can use the VEA wording or modify it with your own thoughts and ideas. Either method is effective. The key is that the conferees need to hear from educators, school administrators, school board members, Board of Supervisor members, classified employees, and exceptional citizens. Everyone needs to let the conferees know that the House budget’s educational funding solution is simply unacceptable.

Should you need further reading to more fully grasp the danger of the proposed House budget, I suggest you read the recent editorials in The Roanoke Times and The Virginian-Pilot. Also, please visit the official RCEA blog and VEA’s Daily General Assembly Reports to keep up on the latest on this battle for the present and future in Virginia Public School Education.

Yours,

Thom Ryder

Monday, February 18, 2008

An Open Letter to RCEA Members

February 18, 2007

An Open Letter to RCEA Members

The Assistant Superintendent for Finance recently showed me an email where I was reportedly promoting the idea that the County would receive $11.9 million in new money from the state if all goes according to plan in the General Assembly this year. If I claimed that, I was in error, and I apologize.

In early January, VEA produced a projection where it took into account various sources of new money for the local budget and came up with the figure of $10.9 million in new state money. At the same time, Penny Hodge projected $8.9 million in new money. In the past, VEA’s projections, according to Pat Wood our Uniserv Director, have been very accurate. Then again, so have Penny’s projections.

I can’t, at this point determine why there is such a discrepancy between the projections; however, I suspect the answer lies in the numbers used for the Average Daily Membership (ADM). As you may know, the state pays localities based on the number of days that each student attends school. A conservative guess would yield a smaller amount and a less conservative guess would yield a larger amount. Whether that is the case or not, I cannot determine at this point.

Of course, any discussion of new money is really quite premature until the General Assembly decides how it is going to handle the state’s financial crisis. Right now, things are looking less and less positive. You can follow their progress by visiting the VEA’s Daily General Assembly Report. (http://www.veaweteach.org/legislative_ga_reports.asp)

Again, I apologize if any of my comments at any time have confused the issue.

Thom

Monday, February 11, 2008

Apples to Apples

Apples to Apples

Over the last two years, the RCEA has made a concerted effort to provide accurate salary data for Roanoke County and surrounding school divisions for our members so that they can draw fair and unbiased comparisons.

Over the same period, RCPS has produced an annual benefits statement which packages all of the benefits offered to our teachers by the county. According to the 2007-2008 statement, RCPS teachers received the following benefits: Salary, FICA Matching (7.65%), VRS Contribution (100%), 457 Investment Plan match up to $120 per year, Basic Term Life and AD&D Insurance Premium (100%), $9,790 or 78.5% of the Employee Health Care Premium (Dental Included?), Sick Leave, Personal Leave, and Partial-Pay personal Leave.

Our school board has made a point to support and promote their benefit package for employees. In the past two years, they have added the 457 match program where they will match up to $120 annually that an employee contributes to a Nationwide 457 investment account. Hopefully over time, this incentive to save will spur employees to take advantage of tax-deferred investment accounts. Currently, only about 18% of school employees take advantage of either 457 or 403B investment plans. Private sector investment account participation rates by employees are much higher.*

The VEA just released a report that compares the “Employer’s Cost of Salary Plus Certain Fringe Benefits for 2006-2007” between all school divisions across the state. Unfortunately due to the complexity of the data, this detailed information is not yet available for the 2007-2008 school year. As far as we can tell, the VEA study is a snapshot of teacher salary at step 10 on the local scale with the addition of family health insurance premiums, income protection, family dental, and the employee share of retirement. Leave and life insurance are not factored into the report.

Locally, the report shows that at step 10, Salem is the king of salary plus benefits by a wide margin. RCPS is a close third in the region just behind Botetourt and just ahead of Craig.

2006-2007 Salary Plus Benefits










Step 10

Step 10

Step 10 Salary

Step 10 Salary

Locality

Salary

Salary Rank

Plus Benefits

Plus Benefits Rank

Bedford

36,676

95

44,138

92

Botetourt

41,519

32

47,938

51

Craig

38,279

71

46,992

63

Floyd

34,900

118

40,209

127

Franklin

36,100

102

41,505

119

Montgomery

36,844

91

44,105

93

Roanoke City

37,345

81

45,002

79

Roanoke County

38,450

69

47,790

56

Salem

40,640

39

49,552

37


We would very much enjoy seeing a comparison of all benefits offered to teachers across all steps on the salary scale in local school divisions. We would especially be interested in learning what type of retirement packages neighboring localities offer employees.

* “By contrast, the participation rate is 56 percent for workers between $20,000 and $40,000, and 70 percent for workers between $40,000 and $80,000.” 2004 http://www.ncpa.org/pub/ba/ba495/

Tuesday, February 5, 2008

Lobby Day 2008

Lobby Day 2008

In Search of Morgan

VEA celebrated Lobby Day 2008 on Monday February 4, 2008 and ten RCEA members attended the gala in Richmond. Actually, our troop (Bud McWhorter, Sarah Hollett, Tammy Wood, Sara Cann, Sheila Salisbury, Tim Summers, Linda Hogan, Thom Ryder, Sherry Foti, and Theresa McGuire) loaded up several cars and headed for Richmond on Sunday afternoon.

VEA staff, Rob Jones and Doris Boitnott briefed the standing room only statewide delegation at a 5:30 gathering and then pizza eating and Super Bowl viewing was the order of the day. In the briefing, however, Rob and Doris highlighted several points of emphasis for our discussions with legislators.

  1. We are seeking money for the state share of a 5% salary raise for teachers.We are seeking the Rebasing of the SOQ’s. The SOQ’s are the regulations and funding components that reflect how the state will support public schools in Virginia. The SOQ are rebased each biennium, the rebasing takes into consideration changes to average daily membership, changes to the composite index as-well-as revisions to the lottery proceeds, sales tax distributions and other factors which help determine the recalculation of the state share of the SOQ.

  1. We support legislation (SB48-Whipple) to provide a guaranteed 30-minute planning period for elementary school teachers. Currently 68 localities have it and many others are within 5 minutes of hiving it, but a bill would provide a mandate to convince the recalcitrant school divisions to provide this most basic professional courtesy.

  1. We oppose tuition tax credits/vouchers.

  1. We oppose any further erosion of VRS funding and support making VRS fully funded.

  1. We oppose the Homestead Exemption as it will potentially starve local school divisions of local funding sources.

The RCEA delegation left the hotel bright and early on Monday morning heading to the General Assembly building in search of senators and delegates with whom to speak. Pat Wood, our Uniserv staff leader, had scheduled several appointments with local representatives for us. Our first stop was the office of Delegate Morgan Griffith. Delegate Griffith, Speaker of the House and representative from Salem, could not schedule an appointment with us due to his busy schedule. We were especially hopeful to check in with Delegate Griffith to see if he had made any headway on finding money for the state share of a 5% pay raise for teachers. Dauntless and full of hope, we waited outside his office door. Unfortunately, Delegate Griffith’s assistant informed us that Morgan had already headed off to committee meetings. She advised us to come back in an hour.

At 9am, we split our delegation. Half of us went to the education subcommittee meeting and watched Delegates William Fralin and Onzlee Ware work within this large committee. The other half went to visit with Senator Ralph Smith, the new state senator from Botetourt. Mr. Smith was gracious, although he seemed a bit quiet when we mentioned our opposition to tuition tax credits and vouchers. We were pleasantly surprised that he stated his opposition to the Homestead Exemption. He said he might be a lone voice voting in opposition, but he felt that it was a political ploy and would not serve localities very well.

The delegation visiting Senator Smith then crammed into elevators to drop by Morgan Griffith’s office again. This time we were met by a different office worker who was running copies. She kindly stopped her copying and came over to speak with us. She told us that the Delegate was extremely busy and hadn’t returned to the office yet. We wrote down our names and gave them to her and secretly vowed to return for our meeting with Morgan (we were beginning to feel like Michael Moore in the movie Roger and Me).

The next stop was a meeting with Delegate Onzlee Ware. Delegate Ware is a staunch friend of public school education. He opposes vouchers. He did seem confused about the elementary planning period bill. He said that others from our group suggested he be opposed to it. We asked him who those people were, and he couldn’t remember exactly. Then we clearly suggested that he SHOULD support planning time for elementary teachers. He told us that he now clearly understands our position. (Rob and Doris…I have more to tell you about this conversation sometime.)

After our meeting with Delegate Ware, we had just enough time to stop by Morgan Griffith’s office. In an exciting development, we noticed that his office door was ajar just a bit. We spoke with the lady with whom we first spoke early that morning. She didn’t seem to remember us. We explained again that we were teachers from Roanoke County here to see Delegate Griffith. There was a pause…then another lady came over from the copy machine to tell us that Morgan was due in House Conference Room #1 in the Capital Building at 11:30. She suggested that our best hope for contacting him was to stop him outside the conference room.

Our next appointment was with our good friend, Senator John Edwards of Roanoke. The Senator was detained in a meeting, but his most gracious assistant, Allison Byrd, spoke with us. Senator Edwards is a 100% friend of VEA. Near the end of our time, Senator Edwards arrived and spoke briefly with us.

Meanwhile, half of our delegation, led by Sarah Hollett, was visiting with William Fralin. Delegate Fralin had supported several bills that concerned us. One bill he sponsored sought to clarify the role of religious expressions in schools.

Board of Education; regulations governing limited public forums and religious viewpoints in the public schools. Provides that a student's voluntary expression of a religious viewpoint on an otherwise permissible subject must be not be discriminated against by local school divisions. Also, local school divisions must establish and implement a policy to ensure that the school division does not discriminate against a student's publicly stated voluntary expression of a religious viewpoint. Requires the Board of Education to promulgate and implement regulations regarding a limited public forum and voluntary student expression of religious viewpoints.”

I always get nervous when legislators start telling people to “promulgate and implement.” Delegate Fralin believes that this topic needs clarification and direction so that practice is in line with the religious liberties guaranteed in the Constitution. Sometimes, however, regulation can make something simple far too complex.

With 11:30 approaching, we hustled as best we could down the stairs and across the courtyard into the capital building. Unfortunately, we couldn’t get through security soon enough to make our way to the conference room to stop Delegate Griffith, and thus ended our quest to speak with Morgan.

As we were about to head for the final rally, Sarah Hollett was contacted by Dr. Lange. A bill that the school division had sponsored by Senator Smith had been moved up to Monday to be heard. Dr. Lange was stuck in Roanoke and asked Sarah to speak to it for her if needed. So Sarah was whisked away by Delegate Fralin and through security where she could be briefed on the bill.

“Reports of Class 1 misdemeanors to school authorities. Provides that local law-enforcement authorities shall report to the school division superintendent and to the principal or his designee all offenses, wherever committed, by students enrolled in the school if such offense would be a Class 1 misdemeanor if committed by an adult.”

After a brief meeting of our complete delegation minus Sarah in the old Senate chamber in the capital building, it was decided that we would head off to lunch and then home. Sarah told us later that she indeed was called upon to speak to the bill, but it was sent away for wordsmithing.

All told, we had a successful trip. Almost all of our area legislators were friendly and accessible. While we didn’t actually see Morgan Griffith, we hope that word gets back to him that we were looking.


After completing this report of our visit, I found a little article on the automatic General Assembly news search feature on this blog. The feed comes from The Richmond Times. The light-hearted piece chronicles a typical day with Morgan Griffith. Here is an interesting tid-bit from that piece:

After another such private meeting, he[Morgan] sneaks quietly back into his office.

Literally.

He was one of the first, if not the first, to have a door put in from his assistant's office to his own three or four years ago.

"I could never get out of my office without being stopped," he says, adding that his staff is instructed to draw visitors away from his door toward a corner area nearby.




Friday, February 1, 2008

Hearing From the People

School Board Report

January 31, 2008

The Roanoke County School Board met this evening for their regular monthly meeting. This was their third regular meeting this month. The big ticket item on the agenda tonight was a public budget hearing. Eight speakers addressed the Board about three different issues. Thom Ryder led off by stating the case for the RCEA salary proposal.

Next up were several speakers who petitioned for the addition of gifted resource teachers. They effectively pointed out that the current gifted resource team is stretched very thin, serving children at five or six elementary schools a piece. Between the testing requirements and the student case-load, the teachers are not able to be as effective as they desire.

The other issue brought before the Board was from parents in the Back Creek community. They were concerned at the alarming trend of higher class sizes in their school. They argued that lower pupil/teacher ratios allow for greater educational success in the classroom. They reported that many classrooms at Back Creek have 23 to 25 children in them which is unacceptable to them.

The meeting also featured a report by Central Middle School’s principal, Becky Rowe. Becky shared data with the Board about the progress students at the school are making. They Board seemed impressed.

Odds and Ends

1. $29,444.72 was the cost of peace of mind at William Byrd. That’s how much it cost for environmental testing to help identify the cause of the mysterious twitching cases back in the Fall.

2. Horace Mann has donated$2000 in order to test all of the toys in the pre-school classrooms for lead paint. More piece of mind.

3. Northside’s geothermal heating and cooling system, an environmentally friendly and highly efficient system, has netted the county a credit of $267,000 from Martin Brothers construction firm.

4. Personnel Policy 7.2 regarding Resident and Non-Resident school attendance was revised to allow grandchildren in legal custody of non-resident former Roanoke County School employees to attend RCPS schools. (Expanded the benefit previously just given to current employees.)

5. The Board approved the spending of $1,282,000 from the personnel department account for various items that were brought up at the January 2 pre-budget hearing. Included in the list is money for HVAC technician, roofing various schools (Penn Forest?) and paving projects. We’ll have a more detailed list of the exact projects when we receive the minutes from the School Board retreat from January 26. According to Penny Hodge, this money has been building in the personnel department’s account over the last few years. The money has carried over and built up to $3.4 million. Mr. Hall felt comfortable allowing the fund to be drawn down to $1.5, with $1.9 million freed up to reapportion. We will also look to the minutes to see how the other $600,000+ are being spent. (They were discussing using some for assistant principals or future elementary school renovations…not sure the final decision.)

5. Allen Journell informed the School Board that due to the reinterpretation of the bank day policy for making up school days missed due to inclement weather, beginning THIS SCHOOL YEAR, RCPS will use bank time to make up the first three missed school days. That means that as of this moment, no matter what happens on Friday, we will have NO days to make-up.

Text of the RCEA Comments to the School Board January 31,2008

RCEA Salary Proposal

These are difficult economic times. Prices of food and energy are rising. Employees are picking up more of the health insurance co-pay. It’s getting more and more difficult to live within today’s economy.

In the last few years, raises for teachers have varied from slightly more than, about the same as, or slightly less than the cost of living. Over the most recent seven year period, disposable income for teachers has generally decreased at most levels when inflation is factored.

Our jobs have become immeasurably more difficult and pressure packed. NCLB, SOL, AYP, ELL, and VGLA are all terms with associated requirements and stresses that the 1998 Roanoke County teacher could just barely conceive. Those terms have changed the face of education in our school system and our state. The teachers have met the challenge of revamping and reworking their instructional models and practices.

Over the same period, compensation for Roanoke County teachers has slipped gradually away from the top tier in the region.

Career earnings (based on the current scale) for Roanoke County teachers now fall behind teachers from Salem, Botetourt, Franklin County, and Roanoke City.

We respectfully request that the school board make a commitment to teacher salary improvement in this year’s budget and the two following budget cycles.

Specifically, we request that you…

· Adjust the mid-range of the scale (approx 1%)

Right now, it takes a teacher around twenty years to reach the halfway point on the scale. We want teachers to reach this milestone earlier. We believe that reaching the midpoint of the scale at the midpoint of a career (30 years) would be a reasonable goal. Neighboring localities reach that level by step 15 (Salem, Franklin Co.)

· Include an across the board 4 % raise for teachers this year

· Agree to a 5% Compensation Commitment over the following two budget years.

These steps, taken in unison and with committed purpose, will work to improve the compensation of our teachers, the most important educational resource.

Thank You

Thom Ryder

RCEA President